Print Page  |  Search     
Hello: Visitor  |  Login  |  My Account  |  Shopping Cart 
Bible Commentary

You are here: Home > Bible Commentary > 1 Corinthians > Chapter 15 > Verse 29

1 Corinthians 15

Verse 1
Verse 2
Verse 3
Verse 4
Verse 5
Verse 6
Verse 7
Verse 8
Verse 9
Verse 10
Verse 12
Verse 13
Verse 14
Verse 15
Verse 17
Verse 20
Verse 21
Verse 22
Verse 23
Verse 25
Verse 26
Verse 27
Verse 28
Verse 29
Verse 30
Verse 31
Verse 32
Verse 33
Verse 34
Verse 35
Verse 36
Verse 37
Verse 38
Verse 39
Verse 40
Verse 42
Verse 43
Verse 44
Verse 45
Verse 46
Verse 49
Verse 50
Verse 51
Verse 52
Verse 53
Verse 55
Verse 56
Verse 58





1 Corinthians 15:29
Previous Verse
1 Corinthians 15:29
Next Verse

Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead?

Note 1 at 1 Cor. 15:29: This verse is one of those sayings of Paul that is "hard to be understood" (2 Pet. 3:16). There is much disagreement about what Paul was really saying here. Suffice it to say that this is not an endorsement for baptizing living people in proxy for those who are dead. There are a number of reasons for rejecting this practice.

First, it would be totally wrong to make a doctrine from one verse of scripture. This is the only time in scripture that this practice is referred to or implied. There are no examples of this ever being done. The scriptures advocate two or three witnesses to establish any truth (Dt. 17:6; 19:15; Mt. 18:16; 2 Cor. 13:1).

Secondly, water baptism has no saving power for those who are alive, so it certainly could not help someone who has died (see ref. a, this verse). Once a person enters into eternity through death, there is no altering his destination (see note 6 at Lk. 16:26, p. 361; see note 4 at Mk. 3:29, p. 186).

So, what was Paul referring to? Scholars don't agree. It is possible that he is being sarcastic. If these Corinthians didn't believe in the resurrection, then why were they baptizing people for the dead? This wouldn't constitute an endorsement of the practice, but just a pointing out of an inconsistency. Paul only mentions this in passing. It is not a major point and no one should make an issue out of it.