Print Page  |  Search     
Hello: Visitor  |  Login  |  My Account  |  Shopping Cart 
Bible Commentary

You are here: Home > Bible Commentary > Mark > Chapter 16 > Verse 16

Mark 16

Verse 2
Verse 3
Verse 6
Verse 7
Verse 8
Verse 9
Verse 10
Verse 14
Verse 15
Verse 16
Verse 17
Verse 18
Verse 20





Mark 16:16
Previous Verse
Mark 16:16
Next Verse

He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Note 9 at Mk. 16:16: This scripture has led many to believe that water baptism is a part of salvation and that the born-again experience cannot be a reality without it. The same kind of thinking would make seeing Jesus a prerequisite for salvation, based on John 6:40.

It is faith in the redemptive work of Christ that produces salvation and not our actions. However, James writes that faith without works is dead (Jas. 2:20). Faith alone saves, but saving faith is never alone; it must be acted upon. This is what Mark is referring to when he speaks of baptism.

Water baptism is a command of Jesus and is the initial action upon believing. This statement of Mark could be rendered, "he who believes with saving faith (i.e. faith that produces actions) will be saved." In this sense, water baptism is very important. It is an opportunity to act on our new profession of faith. Anyone who would refuse to follow the command of Jesus in water baptism would be suspect as to whether they really believed or not.

However, there are scriptural examples of people being born again before they were baptized in water. Cornelius and his friends were filled with the Holy Ghost and spoke in tongues before they were baptized in water (Acts 10:44-48). John 14:17 records Jesus as saying that an unbeliever cannot receive the Holy Ghost (see note 27 at Jn. 14:17, p. 432), so Cornelius and his friends must have been born again before their water baptism.

When Peter was rehearsing the conversion of Cornelius before the believers at Jerusalem, he referred to the baptism of the Holy Ghost as a proof of the Gentiles' conversion but he never mentioned their water baptism (Acts 11:1- 18). This would have been unthinkable if the early church had held water baptism as a requirement of salvation.

Also, in Acts 19:1-7, the apostle Paul found some disciples who had believed on Jesus through the preaching of John the Baptist, and had been water baptized by John, but they had not heard of the baptism of the Holy Ghost. Paul re- baptized them with Christian baptism and then they received the Holy Ghost, but the fact remains that they were Jesus' disciples before they were properly baptized in water.

Water baptism is the sign of the new covenant in the same way that circumcision was the sign of the old covenant. The apostle Paul made it very clear in Romans 4 that although Abraham was circumcised, his circumcision was only a sign. Abraham was justified in the sight of God before his circumcision. Paul goes on to state in Galatians 5:1-6 that anyone who trusts in circumcision is fallen from grace; Christ will profit him nothing.

Circumcision was a command of God that had to be kept (Gen. 17:9-14), yet Abraham was justified over 13 years before he was circumcised (Gen. 15:6 with Gen. 17:23-26). Likewise, water baptism is a command but keeping this command does not produce justification.

Jesus administered forgiveness of sins without any mention of water baptism (Mt. 9:2; Lk. 7:48,50; 18:14; 19:9; 23:43) as did Peter (Acts 3:19-4:4) and Paul (Acts 13:38-43 with 1 Cor. 1:13-17).

Philip told the Ethiopian eunuch, who asked Philip to baptize him, that if he believed with all of his heart, he could be baptized (Acts 8:37). Philip used water baptism only after an individual had already believed. This is how Mark is using water baptism.

Previous Verse   Next Verse